<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 377 and 377A - a lesbian&#8217;s point of view</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saltwetfish.net/journal/2006/11/26/377-and-377a-a-lesbians-point-of-view/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saltwetfish.net/journal/2006/11/26/377-and-377a-a-lesbians-point-of-view/</link>
	<description>Fishing for more thoughts...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: gen x-i</title>
		<link>http://www.saltwetfish.net/journal/2006/11/26/377-and-377a-a-lesbians-point-of-view/#comment-4293</link>
		<dc:creator>gen x-i</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 09:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saltwetfish.net/journal/2006/11/26/377-and-377a-a-lesbians-point-of-view/#comment-4293</guid>
		<description>Thanks - I'm the 'loud' one, the one sitting in the corner talking to you about Macintosh and Singapore bloggers.  Btw, don't have to publish this post in case you are wondering :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks - I&#8217;m the &#8216;loud&#8217; one, the one sitting in the corner talking to you about Macintosh and Singapore bloggers.  Btw, don&#8217;t have to publish this post in case you are wondering :).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kelvinw</title>
		<link>http://www.saltwetfish.net/journal/2006/11/26/377-and-377a-a-lesbians-point-of-view/#comment-4288</link>
		<dc:creator>kelvinw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 18:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saltwetfish.net/journal/2006/11/26/377-and-377a-a-lesbians-point-of-view/#comment-4288</guid>
		<description>Hey gen x-i, er... which person where you? (me blur too many new faces)...

Anyway, section 377 itself actually covers any carnal intercourse "against nature". Depending on how one would interpret it, it could  very well include lesbian sex. 377a specifically deals with men. However, there are not specific clause criminalizing lesbian sex. 337 itself is gender and orientation neutral, it applies to anyone with anyone.

Hence, by removing 377 and keeping 377a, it effectively decriminalize lesbian sex together with other forms of sex between heterosexual couples, only keeping the criminalization of sex between men intact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey gen x-i, er&#8230; which person where you? (me blur too many new faces)&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, section 377 itself actually covers any carnal intercourse &#8220;against nature&#8221;. Depending on how one would interpret it, it could  very well include lesbian sex. 377a specifically deals with men. However, there are not specific clause criminalizing lesbian sex. 337 itself is gender and orientation neutral, it applies to anyone with anyone.</p>
<p>Hence, by removing 377 and keeping 377a, it effectively decriminalize lesbian sex together with other forms of sex between heterosexual couples, only keeping the criminalization of sex between men intact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gen x-i</title>
		<link>http://www.saltwetfish.net/journal/2006/11/26/377-and-377a-a-lesbians-point-of-view/#comment-4285</link>
		<dc:creator>gen x-i</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 04:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saltwetfish.net/journal/2006/11/26/377-and-377a-a-lesbians-point-of-view/#comment-4285</guid>
		<description>Hey Kelvin - it's great catching up with you last nite at Mox.  I have to say I'm a little lost on the recent changes to the Penal Code.  Could you advise whereabouts was the decriminalisation of sexual intercourse between consenting females implied in the recent revision?  The last I recall, there was only mention of 'consenting heterosexual couples'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Kelvin - it&#8217;s great catching up with you last nite at Mox.  I have to say I&#8217;m a little lost on the recent changes to the Penal Code.  Could you advise whereabouts was the decriminalisation of sexual intercourse between consenting females implied in the recent revision?  The last I recall, there was only mention of &#8216;consenting heterosexual couples&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
